GROUPS act like GROUPS (obviously) but can also act as layers. Best way to think about it is that (aside from container level FX) LAYERS will never act like GROUPS unless you group them (or select them together, of course). The move and node tools act differently toward groups and layers.
I invite you to try to work with them and you will see the differences and possibilities. Once you get used to it you are not feeling overwhelmed any more. It is letting you to create many layered works but without a clean and organ ized palette. I have worked with four of them and it is the same thing in all of them. Any advante for working more organi zed and faster is a pro. There are always pros and no cons in using these ranks, but one should choose what object will fit into some group or not. We can duplicate and rotate and do whatever these groups without having to select among such an anount of layers. The group can move without p roblem several objects within, changing its size and so, without having to choose amongs a lot of layers the one that we want to select. The group lets us keep contained many other layers, that cqn be used for drawing different objects and belonging to some final object, A head, for example can have many different objects and at the same time an eye can have many strokes and shapes.so the group let us do ouping and naming these things so that we can work in an orgqnized palette. It is imporant to see that this kind of hierarchy is basic to what we wish to obtain, In fat depending on the position of the layers, the work is changing a lot in the result of our work. kind of place where the obejct or objects within are behaving in relation to other layers that can b. And of course I do not consider a layer as container, though it vqn. I do n ot think a layer is the same as group, though the group is in fqct q kind of layer but specifying that it is containing several layers withiin.
0 kommentar(er)
